Generated from live data
Data: CCCM Cluster Partners Submission
National view

National Overview

Q2 2026 covers sites and catchment areas where CCCM partners are actively present — it is not a census of all displacement sites. Each site is scored Green/Yellow/Red per indicator; the Severity Score is the average share of red-scored indicators across assessed sectors (higher = wider service gap).

Key Findings

    Coverage this quarter Q2 vs Q1 2026

    Sector Performance — Gap vs Coverage % of indicators, sorted by gap

    ◀ Gap (Red)
    Coverage (Green) ▶

    Severity Distribution assessed sites

    Top 10 Service Gaps % of sites scored Red

    Strongest Coverage % of sites scored Green

    District Ranking ≥10 assessed sites · sorted by gap severity

    Demographic Profile Age & sex

    Severity by District

    Distribution of the — assessed sites across severity bands, by district. Severity bands: Severe ≥55%, High 40–55%, Moderate 25–40%, Low <25% of indicators scored Red. All districts are shown; the national ranking highlights those with ≥10 assessed sites.

    Severe (≥55%) High (40–55%) Moderate (25–40%) Low (<25%)
    District
    Site severity mix
    Sites
    DistrictRegionSitesAvg severity SevereHighModerateLow

    Partner Coverage who reports where, and the severity mix of their caseload

    Severity reflects conditions at the sites a partner monitors — it is not a measure of partner performance. Partners work in different districts with different baseline needs.

    PartnerSitesDistricts HouseholdsIndividuals Avg severitySevereHigh ModerateLow

    Site Explorer

    All — assessed sites with per-sector scoring. Filter and sort to prioritise. Each dot is a sector: it shows the share of that sector's indicators scored Red at the site.

    Draft data. Site-level rows come from the live rebuild (— sites), pending IM validation. The officially published Q2 figure is 1,275 sites — do not quote site-level values externally. See the Data Quality tab for the full reconciliation.
    — sites
    Sector dot: 0–25% Red (Low gap) 26–50% (Moderate) 51–90% (High) 91–100% (Critical) Not assessed

    Sector Deep-Dive

    Indicator-level scoring for each sector across the 1,275 assessed sites/catchments. Green = standards met, Yellow = partially met, Red = gap / not conducted. Rows may not sum to 100% where an indicator was not applicable.

    Green Yellow Red
    Red %

    Operational Breakdowns count of sites, unless noted

    Priority Gaps

    Indicator-level service gaps ranked for coordination action. Every percentage carries its denominator; missing and not-applicable responses are excluded, never counted as Red. DRAFT · live rebuild · pending IM validation

    Priority Score

    #IndicatorSectorRed % (n/N) HHs affectedIndividuals affected DistrictsPriority score

    Coverage & Data Quality

    Internal reconciliation view: how the raw submissions became the draft dataset, and how the draft relates to the officially published Q2 figures. External reporting must use the Published figures only.

    Reconciliation — submissions to published

    Matching & completeness

    Partner reporting draft dataset · latest submission per partner

    PartnerSitesLatest submission