National Overview
Key Findings
Q1 vs Q2 2026 coverage
| Q1 2026 | Q2 2026 |
|---|
Sector Performance gap vs coverage, % of applicable indicators
Geographic Analysis
District severity from published results. Grey districts were not individually reported.
Matching sites
OPERATIONAL — LIVE FIELD DATA| Site | District | Region | Catchment | Partner | Severity |
|---|
Catchment analysis
OPERATIONAL — LIVE FIELD DATA| Catchment | District | Region | Sites | Avg. severity | Severe | High | Moderate | Low | On map |
|---|
Sector Gaps
Twelve sectors ranked by service gap. Missing and Not Applicable responses are excluded from every percentage shown.
Top service gaps nationally
District Analysis
Districts with at least 10 assessed sites are eligible for national comparison. Smaller samples are shown separately.
| District | Region | Sites | Gap % | Coverage % |
|---|
Select any district row to open its full profile — assessment coverage, severity distribution, top service gaps and reporting partners.
Reporting partners
Severity reflects conditions in the sites a partner monitors — it is not a measure of partner performance.
Operational Snapshot
OPERATIONAL — LIVE FIELD DATAConnecting to Kobo/Zite…
This section reflects the live field-data pipeline, updated automatically and grouped by catchment and district only — it has not been through Information Management review or cross-checked against the Master List, so its totals will not match the PUBLISHED RESULTS figures above. Households/individuals, where present, are enumerator-reported at the time of assessment, not the verified population figures. Do not cite this section for donor reporting.
| Catchment | District | Region | Sites | Avg. severity | Severe | High | Moderate | Low |
|---|
Data & Downloads
Published exports plus the methodology, sources, limitations and definitions behind every figure.
Published downloads
All downloads are published results and carry the reporting period, data source and generation date.